sh redd1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Sh Redd1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sh redd1/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 2 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "REDD1 promotes obesity-induced metabolic dysfunction via atypical NF-κB activation"
Article Title: REDD1 promotes obesity-induced metabolic dysfunction via atypical NF-κB activation
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34110-1
Figure Legend Snippet: a Weight gain in Redd1 −/− mice and their WT littermates fed NC or HFD for 16 weeks ( n = 6 per group). b Mass of eWAT and iWAT in NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 −/− mice and their WT littermates ( n = 8 per group). c Representative images of perilipin (green) and F4/80 (purple) staining in the eWAT of NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 −/− mice and WT littermates ( n = 8 per group). Scale bar, 100 μm. d Average adipocyte size in the eWAT of NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 −/− mice and WT littermates ( n = 8 per group). e Relative area of F4/80-positive cells in the eWAT of NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 −/− mice and WT littermates ( n = 8 per group). f Relative number of crown-like structures (CLSs) in the eWAT of NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 −/− mice and WT littermates ( n = 8 per group). g NF-κB activity in the eWAT from NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 −/− mice and WT littermates ( n = 6 per group). h Plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines in NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 −/− mice and WT littermates ( n = 6 per group). Bar graphs represent mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance was calculated using two-way ANOVA followed by the Holm–Sidak post hoc test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Staining, Activity Assay, Clinical Proteomics
Figure Legend Snippet: a Fasting plasma levels of glucose and insulin in NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 −/− mice and their WT littermates ( n = 6 per group). b Representative images of insulin (green)-stained pancreatic islets from NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 −/− mice and WT littermates ( n = 6 per group). Scale bar, 100 μm. c Quantification of average islet size ( n = 6 per group). d Calculation of the HOMA-IR scores ( n = 6 per group). e Assessment of GTT and ITT in mice fasting for 12 and 6 h, respectively, in NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 −/− mice and WT littermates ( n = 8 per group). f Representative western blots of Akt phosphorylation and plasma membrane-associated GLUT4 (PM-GLUT4) in eWAT and skeletal muscle from mice injected i.p. with saline or insulin ( n = 3). g Representative western blots of phosphorylated Akt and FOXO1 in the liver of mice injected with saline or insulin ( n = 6). h Quantification of the phosphorylated FOXO1 to total FOXO1 ratio ( n = 6 per group). i Quantification of G6pc , Pck1 , and Fbp1 mRNA levels in the liver ( n = 6 per group). Bar graphs represent mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance was calculated using two-way ANOVA followed by the Holm–Sidak post hoc test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Clinical Proteomics, Staining, Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Membrane, Injection, Saline
Figure Legend Snippet: a Weight gain over time in Redd1 fl/fl ( R fl/fl ) and Redd1 Δ Adipoq ( R Δ Adipoq ) mice fed HFD for 16 weeks ( n = 6 per group). b Mass measurements for the eWAT and iWAT in HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ Adipoq mice ( n = 6 per group). c Representative images showing perilipin (green) and F4/80 (purple) staining in the eWAT of Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ Adipoq mice fed HFD ( n = 6 per group). Scale bar, 100 μm. d NF-κB activity in the eWAT from HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ Adipoq mice ( n = 6 per group). e , f Plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines in HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ Adipoq mice ( n = 6 per group). g Fasting plasma levels of glucose and insulin in HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ Adipoq mice ( n = 6 per group). h Assessment of GTT and ITT in HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ Adipoq mice after fasting for 12 and 6 h, respectively ( n = 5 per group). i , j Representative western blots of phosphorylated IRS-1 and Akt in the eWAT and skeletal muscle ( i ) and phosphorylated Akt and FOXO1 in the liver ( j ) of NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ Adipoq mice after i.p. injection of saline or insulin ( n = 3). k Relative expression levels of G6pc , Pck1 , and Fbp1 in the liver of HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ Adipoq mice compared with NC-fed mouse groups ( n = 6 per group). Bar graphs represent mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed t-test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Staining, Activity Assay, Clinical Proteomics, Western Blot, Injection, Saline, Expressing, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: a Weight gain in Redd1 fl/fl ( R fl/fl ) and Redd1 Δ LysM ( R Δ LysM ) mice fed HFD for 16 weeks ( n = 5 per group). b Measurement of fat (eWAT + iWAT) mass in HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ LysM mice ( n = 5 per group). c Representative images showing perilipin (green) and F4/80 (purple) staining in the eWAT of HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ LysM mice ( n = 5 per group). Scale bar, 100 μm. d NF-κB activity in the eWAT from HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ LysM mice ( n = 5 per group). e Plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines in HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ LysM mice ( n = 5 per group). f Fasting plasma levels of glucose and insulin in HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ LysM mice ( n = 5 per group). g Calculation of HOMA-IR scores in HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ LysM mice ( n = 5 per group). h Assessment of GTT and ITT in HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ LysM mice fasting for 12 and 6 h, respectively ( n = 5 per group). i , j Representative western blots of the insulin-responsive phosphorylation of IRS-1 and Akt in the eWAT and skeletal muscle ( i ) and phosphorylation of Akt and FOXO1 in the liver ( j ) of NC- or HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ LysM mice ( n = 3). k Relative expression levels of G6pc , Pck1 , and Fbp1 in the liver of HFD-fed Redd1 fl/fl and Redd1 Δ LysM mice compared with NC-fed mouse groups ( n = 5 per group). Bar graphs represent mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed t -test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Staining, Activity Assay, Clinical Proteomics, Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Expressing, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: a – c Representative oil red-O (ORO)-stained images of WT and Redd1 −/− SVF cells ( a ), shControl (shC)- or sh-Redd1-transfected 3T3-L1 cells ( b ), and WT ( Redd1 fl/f l , R fl/fl ) and Redd1 Δ Adipoq ( R Δ Adipoq ) SVF cells ( c ) when cultured in differentiation medium (MDI) and quantification of relative ORO intensity ( n = 4). d – f , Expression levels of adipogenic genes ( d ), REDD1 ( e ), and lipogenic genes ( f ) in R fl/fl and R Δ Adipoq SVF cells cultured in MDI medium and quantification of relative ORO intensity ( n = 4). g Assessment of NF-κB–Luc activity in 3T3-L1 cells transfected either with siRNA for control, Ikka , Ikkb , or NF-κB p65 ( p65 ) or with pcDNA3.1/His- Ikba ( n = 5). h , i Representative images and realative quantification of ORO-stained images ( h ) and expression levels of Pparg and Cebpa ( i ) in 3T3-L1 cells infected with control adenovirus (Ad-C) or adenoviral Redd1 (Ad- R ) after transfection with vector alone or pcDNA3.1/His- Ikba ( n = 4). j NF-κB–Luc activity in mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with Ad-C or Ad- Redd1 ( n = 4). k Cytokine production in mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with Ad-C or Ad- Redd1 ( n = 5). Bar graphs represent mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA ( g , h ) and two-way ANOVA ( a , i ) followed by the Holm–Sidak post hoc test and an unpaired two-tailed t -test ( b – f , j , k ). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Staining, Transfection, Cell Culture, Expressing, Activity Assay, Control, Infection, Plasmid Preparation, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: a Predictive binding conformation between REDD1 and IκBα using computational protein-protein molecular docking methods. b Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of the interaction between REDD1 and IκBα in HEK293 cells transfected with pcDNA3.1/His- Ikba (His- Ikba ) and either pFlag-CMV-1- Redd1 ( Redd1 ) or Redd1 mutants ( R KKAA and R KKRAAA ) ( n = 3). c Representative confocal images of NF-κB p65 nuclear translocalization in HEK293 cells infected with Ad-C, Ad- Redd1 , or its mutants ( n = 4). Scale bar, 50 μm. d Assessment of NF-κB–Luc activity in 3T3-L1 cells infected with Ad-control, Ad- Redd1 , or its mutants ( n = 4). e Representative ORO-stained images of 3T3-L1 cells infected with Ad-control, Ad- Redd1 , or Ad- Redd1 KKAA and quantification of relative ORO intensity ( n = 4). f Expression levels of Pparg and Cebpa in 3T3-L1 cells infected with Ad-control, Ad- Redd1 , or Ad- Redd1 KKAA ( n = 4). g Production of MCP-1 and TNF-α in macrophages infected with Ad-control, Ad- Redd1 , or Ad- Redd1 KKAA ( n = 4). Bar graphs represent mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA ( d , e ) and two-way ANOVA ( f , g ) followed by the Holm–Sidak post hoc test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Transfection, Infection, Activity Assay, Control, Staining, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: a Weight gain in WT and Redd1 KKAA mice after being fed HFD for 16 weeks ( n = 10 per group). b eWAT and iWAT mass measurements in HFD-fed Redd1 KKAA mice and their WT littermates ( n = 10 per group). c Expression levels of Pparg and Cebpa in the eWAT of Redd1 KKAA mice and WT littermates fed HFD for 10 weeks ( n = 8 per group). d Representative images showing perilipin (green) and F4/80 (purple) staining in the eWAT of HFD-fed Redd1 KKAA mice and WT littermates ( n = 5 per group). Scale bar, 100 μm. e NF-κB activity in the eWAT from HFD-fed Redd1 KKAA mice and WT littermates ( n = 6 per group). f , g Plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines in HFD-fed Redd1 KKAA mice and WT littermates ( n = 8 per group). h Fasting plasma levels of glucose and insulin in HFD-fed Redd1 KKAA mice and WT littermates ( n = 8 per group). i Assessment of GTT and ITT in HFD-fed Redd1 KKAA mice and WT littermates after fasting for 12 and 6 h, respectively ( n = 6 per group). j , k Representative western blots of insulin-responsive Akt phosphorylation and plasma membrane-associated GLUT4 (PM-GLUT4) levels in the eWAT and skeletal muscle ( j ) and Akt and FOXO1 phosphorylation in the liver ( k ) of HFD-fed Redd1 KKAA mice and WT littermates ( n = 3). l Relative expression levels of G6pc , Pck1 , and Fbp1 in the liver of HFD-fed Redd1 KKAA mice and WT littermates compared with NC-fed mice ( n = 6 per group). Bar graphs represent mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed t -test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Staining, Activity Assay, Clinical Proteomics, Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Membrane, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: a Representative images of H&E-stained liver tissues from HFD-fed Redd1 −/− , Redd1 ΔAdipoq , Redd1 Δ LysM , Redd1 KKAA , and control mice, and quantification of hepatic steatosis from H&E-stained liver tissues ( n = 6 per group). Scale bars, 100 μm. b Expression levels of Acc , Fasn , and Scd-1 in the liver of HFD-fed Redd1 −/− , Redd1 ΔAdipoq , Redd1 Δ LysM , Redd1 KKAA , and their control mice ( n = 6 per group). Bar graphs represent mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed t -test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Staining, Control, Expressing, Two Tailed Test
